A Call To
Holiness
A Series through
1 Corinthians
Part 18 – I Do!
(7:1-6)
***Commentaries
by David Prior, Leon Morris and Simon Kistemaker have contributed greatly to
this outline***
I. Introduction
Last
week someone joked around with me after the sermon and said, “We’re not going
to give you two weeks off anymore, you yell too much when you come back!” It was really a joy to be back in the pulpit
last week after a couple of weeks off. Now, it’s a joy to be here this morning in this new location (new to us,
anyway). I look forward to what God has
in store for us in this building. I
would encourage you to invite your friends; there is plenty of room for them
now!
It
seems fitting that we wrapped up a chapter of 1 Corinthians last week. New building, new chapter. However, we must never forget that 1
Corinthians was written as a letter and letters were not read one paragraph at
a time. This is why we take so much time
each week to remind ourselves of the context of the passage that we are about
to dive into.
Last
week we talked about the need for purity in the sexual realm. We saw that God designed sexual relations for
the confines of the marriage relationship and that having sex outside of
marriage is not only a sin, but illogical. You cannot be one flesh with someone outside of the marriage
relationship. It’s literally impossible. The Corinthians were practicing prostitution
but prostitution itself is not the issue. Purity is the issue.
Now,
we get to talk about one of my favorite subjects in all of life. Marriage. I love talking about marriage. I’ve been trying to figure out why I love talking about marriage so
much. It’s something that has really
just recently happened. You may or may
not know that I have been married once before
So,
let’s take a look at our passage for today, but first, a story:
Side Show is an unusual musical based on the true story of the
Hilton twins. They were Siamese twins
who rose from exploited poverty as a sideshow attraction to become a singing
and dancing vaudeville act in the 1930s and, later, stars of B-grade films.
One
unusual element of this play is that the two lead actresses must play their
parts “joined at the hip.” It doesn’t
matter how good their individual talents are if they can’t work together, and
if they can’t do it convincingly. The
success of the show depends on the success of their partnership. If one of them decides to go solo, the show
is over! They’re only in business as
long as they stick together.
That
is a good picture of marriage. Once the
commitment is made, husband and wife are, as it were, “joined at the hip.” They succeed or fail together. Other people don’t generally think of one
without thinking of the other. Wherever
life’s drama takes them, their success lies in doing it together.
1 Corinthians 7:1-7 Now concerning the matters about which you
wrote: "It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a
woman." (2) But because of the temptation to sexual
immorality, each man should have his own wife and each woman her own
husband. (3) The husband should give to his wife her
conjugal rights, and likewise the wife to her husband. (4) For the wife does not have authority over her
own body, but the husband does. Likewise the husband does not have authority
over his own body, but the wife does. (5) Do not
deprive one another, except perhaps by agreement for a limited time, that you
may devote yourselves to prayer; but then come together again, so that Satan
may not tempt you because of your lack of self-control. (6) Now as a concession, not a command, I say
this. (7) I wish that all were as I myself am. But each
has his own gift from God, one of one kind and one of another.
II. Marriage
is good (7:1-6)
In
verse 1 we have the first of many “now concerning” statements. These statements introduce topics that the
Corinthians somehow asked Paul about. These questions were asked via written correspondence with Paul. Look at verse 1.
1 Corinthians 7:1 Now concerning the matters about which you
wrote: "It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a
woman."
We don’t really know how
this correspondence was delivered but most scholars believe that it was
delivered by 3 guys named Stephanas, Fortunatus and Achaicus (
Some scholars interpret the
statement “It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman” as a
quote from Paul. Others interpret it as
a quote from the letter that the Corinthians wrote to Paul. I adopt the latter of these two interpretations. For Paul to say that it is good for a man not
to have sex with a woman is to deny God’s plan for marriage and His command to
“be fruitful and multiply.” So, the
conclusion is that the Corinthians had adopted this mantra from somewhere.
It is quite likely that a
group of people had set themselves so far apart from the immorality of the
culture that they decided that it is a good idea to be celibate. This is a common problem. When people find something that they disagree
with they react in the opposite direction so much that they themselves wind up
being completely wrong, as well. It
would be like responding to the sin of abortion by saying that no one should
have children. We need to be careful
about that and Paul is about to correct the Corinthians thinking on it, as
well.
1 Corinthians 7:2 But because of the temptation to sexual
immorality, each man should have his own wife and each woman her own husband.
The primary reason that
Paul gives to the Corinthians for marrying is so that they won’t succumb to
sexual temptation. We must be careful not to think that Paul believed this to
be the primary reason for marriage period. We know from his other writings that the marriage relationship is one
that reflects Christ and the church. This is a peripheral reason for marriage, but one that cannot be
dismissed.
Also, it is interesting to
note that Paul is championing monogamy. Notice how he says that each man should have his own wife and each woman
her own husband? The wife and husband
are to have a singular partner.
Paul uses a phrase that
should be familiar to us. He said, “Each
man should have…and each woman should have.” Back in 1 Corinthians 5 Paul said that a man “has his father’s wife.” We know the context there is that this
particular son is having sexual relations with his father’s wife. So also, the context here is sex. Paul is not simply saying that each man
should be married and each woman should be married—he is saying that each
married person should be having sex with their partner. And with their partner alone.
Paul clarifies what he
means in the next two verses.
1 Corinthians 7:3-4 The husband should give to his wife her
conjugal rights, and likewise the wife to her husband. (4) For the wife does not have authority over her
own body, but the husband does. Likewise the husband does not have authority
over his own body, but the wife does.
Notice that Paul does not put one member of the
marriage in authority over the other in regards to the sexual
relationship. The wife has equal rights
to her husband’s body as the husband does to his wife’s body.
There is much debate over
whether or not Paul was ever married. We
know that when he penned 1 Corinthians he was single (7:8). However, we also know that Paul was a member
of the Sanhedrin and one of the requirements of being a member was that you
were married. If nothing else, the keen
insight that Paul has to marriage definitely leads us to believe that he was
married at one time.
Also, Paul is sticking with
the theme of your body not being your own. Remember we looked at that last week (
How do you honor your
spouse with your body? Well, there’s
more ways than just one, but Paul gives us a glimpse into what he had in mind.
1 Corinthians 7:5 Do not deprive one another, except perhaps by
agreement for a limited time, that you may devote yourselves to prayer; but
then come together again, so that Satan may not tempt you because of your lack
of self-control.
Paul’s basic instruction is
do not deprive your spouse of their sexual desires. What seems to be an exception is not an
exception at all. The “exception” is
done by agreement. The Greek word
translated “agreement” is the word that we get symphony from. The husband and wife must be in symphony when
deciding to go on a sex fast. One person
cannot declare it. There is still no
authority of one single person. Just
like the actors in the play we talked about in the introduction, you cannot go
solo and be successful. You do not get
credit for being more spiritual if you are denying your partner their
rights.
Something that is really
interesting, and doesn’t necessarily come out in the English translation, is
that phrase “do not deprive one another” could be better translated, “do not
defraud one another.” This gives us a
bit of insight to a couple of things.
First, we can trace back
this word “defrauded” to chapter 6. When
Paul was chastising the Corinthians for taking their lawsuits before non-believers
to judge he said, “is it not better to be defrauded?” It’s the same word. He’s playing to their desire to be treated
fairly. Notice in the verse 3 he uses
the term “rights.” “The husband should
give to his wife her conjugal rights.” The Corinthians were very concerned about
their personal rights and about not being defrauded. Paul used their own soap box issues to
encourage them to have healthy marriages.
Second, this gives us a
little bit of insight into the intimacy of prayer. The most intimate and pleasurable act that we
are allowed to experience on this earth is the joy of sexual pleasure with our
spouses. Paul breaks in and says there
may be some occasions where you need to give up that intimacy with your spouse
to have more intimacy with God. We
should note that the sex fast is for a limited time. The language and context give us indication
that the time frame should be determined before hand and agreed upon by both
parties.
The reason that it should
be for a limited time is that Satan will begin to tempt a person based on their
weaknesses. Now, it must be pointed out
that Paul is not condemning the desire for sex with your spouse. He states that Satan will tempt them and he
knows that they do not have the self control to resist Satan’s
temptations. His concern is not their
desire, but their lack of self control.
1 Corinthians 7:6 Now as a concession, not a command, I say
this.
In most English Bibles this
verse starts a new paragraph. However,
it is best to put it with the previous passage. So, Paul was saying that the abstaining from sex with your partner for
the purpose of prayer is a concession, meaning that it’s allowed, but not a
command. You will not find any command
in the Bible for a married couple to abstain from sex. This is a concession for the purpose of
prayer. This speaks even more strongly
to the intimacy of the prayer relationship with God that I spoke about earlier.
III. Conclusion
It is a blatant and outright sin to deny your
partner of the conjugal rights. There
are all kinds of excuses used for not fulfilling the desire of the spouse. Headaches, fatigue, medical issues, fear,
children, etc. are often quoted as valid reasons for not having sex with a
spouse. This is ridiculous. The command of the Bible is to fulfill your
spouses’ sexual desires. Your body does
not belong to you. It’s not about
you. If a married person is really more concerned
about their spouse than they are about themselves we see a successful
marriage. Selfishness destroys marriages.
If you are having trouble
in your marriage I encourage you to seek someone out that you trust and tell
them your issues. Let them pray with you
and for you. Erin and I would be happy
to do that. There are many other people
who would be happy to do that. You
should feel the safety to come to any of the elders or church leaders and get
solid, confidential advice on your issue. Please seek us out if needed, we are passionate about healthy marriages.


